X-MARINE

He who studies history shall know the future for all things come full circle.

Thursday, May 31, 2007

George W. Bush: Babylonian

As I have written before regarding Babylon the Great anyone supporting such a scheme must be considered a "Babylonian". This is a person in government who rejects "nationalism" and really cannot be considered an "American" since they sincerely cannot defend the U.S. Constitution because of their deference to all things globalist. They will often defend their rationale by calling others "natavist" or "Nazi" or some other epithet for challenging their fundamental belief in global governance and commerce.

First and foremost, President George W. Bush has never claimed to be a "conservative" but in fact and action has always been leftwing in his outlook on Federal spending as well as embracing Wilsonian precepts of international involvement in the spirit of the League of Nations when it comes to foreign affairs. He came to power primarily because the leftwing of the Democrat Party abandoned their own party to the Republican base and because Vice President Al Gore completely fumbled the ball by embracing a corrupt state Supreme Court dominated by Democrats to try to overturn an election in his favor when then candidate George Bush relied on the Federal Supreme Court to cement his victory in 2000. Rock, Paper or Scissors - apparently that dumb old George Bush outsmarted the "brilliant" Al Gore by relying on a federal court instead of a state court to validate his victory.

So, since then, President George W. Bush has steadfastly adhered to expanding the Federal government and embracing commercial Babylon at every step. Even when the War On Terror was initiated after that infamous attack on 9/11, he has embraced "coalitions" and the "United Nations" to propel American Foreign Policy forward in the 21st Century contrary to most leftwing pundits who think he is acting "unilaterally". If you have felt frustrated as I have with the pace of the "War On Terror" by the President's actions I don't blame you. He has moved against our enemies in fine Babylonian fashion by embracing a politically correct vision of the world where Islam is treated equally as Christianity and the careful and plodding military operations in the Middle East are carefully choreographed not to upset the markets on Wall Street. The Republican controlled Congress could have and would have given President Bush an actual Declaration of War if he had petitioned them for it right after 9/11 but alas, he was silent on enforcing the provisions of war as outlined in the US Constitution as surely this would have emboldened "nationalism" too much. Of course, Congress failed too by not demanding a Declaration of War instead of an ambiguous "authorization" to use force to deal with our Islamic enemies.

And now we have "Immigration Reform" that Babylonians of all stripes are so eager to impose upon the American people as the latest outrage. If you are a "Commerical" Babylonian then the addition of 12 million new slaves doing the "jobs Americans won't do" appeals to you. If you are a "Political" Babylonian then the addition of 12 million new voters from Mexico, Guatemala, South America and wherever else them come from will appeal to you. Naturally, the Catholic Church has interfered by offering their churches as "sanctuaries" for illegal aliens and thus "Religious" Babylon is propelled forward at the expense of the true Church as expressed in the Protestant Reformation which for all practical purposes has now ended. In other words, what made this country what it was, Anglo-Saxon constitutional principles, commerce with borders, and a Protestant Christian orientation, has all been subsumed to Babylon the Great.

Is it all George W. Bush's fault? No, of course not. He is but one in a long line of political elites who have embraced a "greater good" of an internationalism that ultimately will lead to dictatorship and loss of sovereignty with no means of ever retrieving it with the possible exception of a slide to civil war which is in no ones interest. If it comes to this then there are no guarantees what will be left afterward will be recognizable as the grand Republic that we have all been blessed to being a part of and have been accustomed to for so long. Although, it could be argued the Republic is no longer what it used to be anyway.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home